Send article
i

This section publishes information about the details for submission of articles, the journal launch and other relevant news. 

A defense of the judgment Gonzáles Lluy vs. Ecuador delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Authors

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021): Anuario de Derechos Humanos
https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-2279.2021.60407

Abstract

The main goal of this article is to roughly defend the reasoning followed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of González Lluy v. Ecuador. The paper will be structured according to the following order: first, we will describe the facts of the case. In second and third place, we will analyse and asses the way in which the Court used, on the one hand, the argument regarding stereotypes and, on the other, the proportionality test. Next, we will consider and refute the objection regarding the use of the proportionality test based on the notion of minimum content of social rights. Finally, we will present our conclusions as a summary.

Keywords:

Right to education, stereotype analysis, proportionality test, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Gonzáles Lluy v. Ecuador

Author Biographies

Federico De Fazio, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Federico de Fazio es abogado, magíster y doctor por la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Investigador asistente del Conicet. Docente de la Universidad de Buenos Aires.

 

Celeste Novelli, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Celeste Novelli es docente de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, y magíster en Derechos Humanos y Democratización en Latinoamérica del Centro Internacional de Estudios Políticos de la Universidad Nacional de San Martín, Argentina. Doctoranda en Derecho Constitucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires y exbecaria del Conicet, Argentina. Actualmente se desempeña como abogada en la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.

Downloads

Altmetrics
How to Cite
De Fazio, F., & Novelli, C. (2021). A defense of the judgment Gonzáles Lluy vs. Ecuador delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Anuario De Derechos Humanos, 17(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.5354/0718-2279.2021.60407
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
 
Anuario de Derechos Humanos
Facultad de Derecho
Universidad de Chile
DATOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN
Dirección de Servicios de Información y Bibliotecas (SISIB)